Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category
Petition for Homelands
The NT Government has announced it will focus funding on 20 growth towns in the Territory. Around 600 homelands will share just $20 million over three years, ensuring the chronic underfunding will only get worse.
The Government is passively centralising Indigenous settlements, all the while ignoring mounting proof that people who live on their homelands are healthier than those who live in towns. Living on homelands allows healthier people through connections with ancestral lands and spirits, and through healthier eating and exercise as people gather and hunt traditional foods (CSIRO).
GetUp! Is holding a petition to send a message to the Ministers to SAVE the homelands. But hurry -time is running out.
www.getup.org.au/campaign/Homelands&id=747
This works!
A new excellent initiative by the Women for Wik group is the new website What’s working. Here, the group will collect and publish information about projects that have been proven to work in Indigenous communities. With the negative media coverage that Indigenous communities overwhelmingly have in mainstream media, this site can become a valuable source of information about what has worked. Here’s the launch letter by Eva Cox:
White-list is the new black
What’s working in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities all over
Australia? Lots of very good projects and programs, most of which are
locally run and controlled!
Why do most people think nothing works? Because a lot of the good stuff gets
overlooked, defunded or just ignored by most mainstream media. What have we
done? Set up a webpage www.whatsworking.com.au to collect evidence and
showcase good Indigenous projects that was launched yesterday in Sydney.
Next step suggested at the Launch was adding a White-list to show all the
recent and current good projects that were/are working before defunding or
being closed. Some are CDEP projects, others short term pilot programs that
didn’t get followed up.
Why should people know about good programs and bad funding decisions?
Because our levels of ignorance allows Governments to make too many bad
decisions that ignore evidence, such as the latest attempt to under-fund and
therefore undermine the Homelands policy in the NT.
We launched the webpage with an encouraging message from Marian Scrymgour,
and Larissa Behrendt’s speech explaining why so many /government decisions
failed to take note of evidence of what does work we celebrated with some 50
plus list members at the Mori Gallery. Darlene Johnson, who has made films
in the NT and Eileen Cummings added their voices to the importance of
understanding issues like the NT homelands.
What can you do? Look at the webpage and see what we have found so far. Tell
us about any other projects you know about, so we can continue to publicise
what works. Tell us if something has been de-funded or closed, despite being
needed and working well.
We are also doing this because we want voters to make more informed
decisions than the politicians they elected! Despite the Apology, progress
has been slow and sometimes policies have gone backwards, often because of
relentlessly negative reporting of crises and deficits.
Women for Wik will holds governments to their stated commitment to
evidence-based policies by offering access to evidence of the programs that
have worked, are working and could work with appropriate support. By
offering the wider community a clearer understanding of the good stuff that
is happening, we hope to build support for policies that respect and enhance
the capacities of our Indigenous communities to manage their own lives.
eva cox for the co-ordinating group 28.6.09
Where’s the economic modelling?
Dampier Peninsula outstation at Chile Creek. Photo: ardi.com.au
NT Opposition leader Adam Giles of the Country Liberal Party has pointed out one of the Government’s many flaws in their outstations policy. Macklin has announced that funding will be targeted to larger population centres, and which communities these are would be based on their prospects for economic development. As Adam Giles points out, no economic modelling has been made to determine which communities are chosen. The communities were therefore chosen based on population size, existing services and location. What kind of economic development does the government have in mind? Industry? Mining? Manufacturing? Education? None of this has been made clear, but one thing is clear: the government understands poorly what self-determination entails for economic development.
The “Healthy People, Healthy Country” report from 2007 shows how connections with country are one of the key elements in healthy Indigenous communities, along side employment and education. Larger communities deny the nurturing of bonds with country, connections that are much stronger and hold far more importance than simple walks in national parks do for non-Indigenous Australians. Denying that bond contributes to a loss of self and thereby health that needs to be considered in the government’s economic policies of centralisation, or ‘normalisation’ as the process has been termed this time ’round.
The government here shows another joint in the series of dishonest reasoning for their interventions into Indigenous communities. The ‘emergency’ intervention into Indigenous communities in 2007 was also based on half-baked rationales, for solving a crisis the Howard government had ignored for 10 years. These are thinly veiled means to continue two centuries of cultural erasure, to get rid of the symptoms of a dysfunction the Australian government has created.
What of the excellent employment ideas that are emerging out of remote communities? Rangers patroling Australia’s borders and maintaining biodiversity in Australia’s unique natural environment, running tourism operations, or very promisingly -becoming part of the global carbon trading scheme? The latter is potentially worth millions of dollars to Indigenous land holders, depending on whether the participants at the Copenhagen meeting this year will include land use emissions in the carbon equation. -Here surely is a place for the government to be lobbying to achieve economic sustainability in Indigenous communities?
Where is the economic modelling for identifying economically viable communities? I’d like to see it involving all potential economic opportunities.. and I wouldn’t like to see economic viability equated with proximity to non-Indigenous culture.
Doubting Climate Change?
Have a look at the Australian Greenhouse Office Climate Change FAQs document!
Climate change impacts on Indigenous ways of life
When Aili Keskitalo, then President of the Sami Parliament spoke to the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues in May 2007, she presented concern that “The degradation of the environment in Inuit and Saami traditional territories caused by e.g. pollution, non-sustainable natural resource extraction and climate change constitute a great threat to their traditional lifestyles and culture. Climate change impacts on the environment in Inuit and Saami territories, e.g. changing the fundaments for their traditional livelihoods in a paramount way”. Climate change is not only of concern in Arctic regions. In northern Australia, cyclones, floods, drought, and their effect on health and infrastructure pose a further threat as result of climate change. To find ways of handling climate change, partnership and dialogue must be created between Indigenous peoples and their governments. Keskitalo went on to commend the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples for their important guidance in developing such cooperation.
The sixth session of the Permanent Forum held 14 to 25 May 2007 announced that the 2008 special theme would be “Climate Change, Bio-cultural Diversity and Livelihoods: The Stewardship role of Indigenous Peoples and new Challenges” (MessageStick June 2007)
